Dismissed
Dr.B.R.Solanki v. Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCCAW/1578/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The application has become rendered infructuous with the passage of time and is accordingly disposed of as such.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
:1:
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1578 OF 2006
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5462 OF 2006
¶3
Dr. B. R. Solanki ..Applicant
¶4
versus
¶5
Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents
¶6
Mrs. K. S. Kambli h/f. Shri V. M. Thorat
Advocate for the Applicant.
¶7
CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &
NARESH H. PATIL, JJ.
¶8
DATE : 24TH AUGUST, 2006
¶9
P.C. :
¶10
. Learned Advocate for the Applicant states
that with the passage of time the Application has
become rendered infructuous. Application is
accordingly disposed of as become infructuous.
¶11
(R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. )
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Dr. B. R. Solanki
- respondent
Union of India & Ors.
Coram
AI extract
R.M.S. Khandeparkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court