This order dismisses Arbitration Suit No. 3490 of 1987 without arguing that the judgment in the concurrently decided Suit No. 3489 covers the controversy, with no order as to costs.
Suit dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION SUIT NO. 3490 OF 1987
The Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. ] .. Plaintiffs
Versus
1. The Union of India & Anr. ] .. Defendants
Mr. Milind Vasudeo i/b M/s. Harish Joshi & Co. for
the plaintiffs.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the defendants.
CORAM: R.M. LODHA, &
S.A. BOBDE, JJ.
DATED: 14TH DECEMBER, 2006
P.C. :
. The counsel for the parties agree that the
judgment delivered by us today in Arbitration Suit
No.3489 of 1987 covers the controversy raised in this
Suit as well.
2. For the reasons that we have indicated in our
judgment while deciding Arbitration Suit No.3489 of
1987, the present Suit is also liable to be dismissed
and is dismissed accordingly with no order as to costs.
Sd/-
[R.M. LODHA, J.]
Sd/-
: 2 :
[S.A. BOBDE, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present Arbitration Suit requires separate adjudication given the contention that the judgment in Suit No.3489 covers the same controversy.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arbitration Suit No.3489 of 1987Followed¶11
R.M. Lodha
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court