HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYIN THE…
The appellant's appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. Claimants are entitled to withdraw the amount deposited by the appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 1072 OF 2005
IN
L.A.R. NO. 3 OF 1998
Maharashtra State Road Transport ] .. Appellants
Corporation. ](Ori.Acq.Body)
Versus
1. Nagubai G. Patil & 5 ors. ] .. Respondents
(Ori.Claimants)
Mr. C.M. Lokesh i/b M/s. G.S. Hegde & Associates for
the appellants.
Mr. C.M. Korde, senior counsel with Mr. Milind Jadhav
i/b Pravin Mehta & Mithi & Co. for the original
claimants.
P.C. :
. Mr. C.M. Lokesh, the Advocate for the
appellants submits that Mr. G.S. Hegde, Advocate is to
argue the matter and since he is held up in some other
Court, he prays for adjournment.
2. We find no justifiable reason to adjourn the
matter. We asked Mr. C.M. Lokesh, Advocate, to
proceed with the arguments. He did not do so. In the
: 2 :
circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the Appeal
for want of prosecution.
3. Appeal is dismissed accordingly.
4. Upon dismissal of the Appeal, the claimants
shall be entitled to withdraw the amount deposited by
the appellants before this Court.
Sd/-
[R.M. LODHA, J.]
Sd/-
[S.A. BOBDE, J.]
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
Nagubai G. Patil
5 ors
R.M. LODHA
S.A. BOBDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court