Dismissed

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Shri Bhalchandra Jagu Patil and Ors.

Bombay HC14 Dec 2006APP/1071/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed Appeal No. 1071 of 2005 filed by Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation and ordered the claimants to withdraw the deposited amount due to the appellant's failure to prosecute.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed. Claimants directed to withdraw the amount deposited before this Court.

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2006)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶2

APPEAL NO. 1071 OF 2005

¶3

IN

¶4

 L.A.R. NO. 4 OF 1998

¶5

 Maharashtra State Road Transport ] .. Appellants
 Corporation. ](Ori.Acq.Body)

¶6

 Versus

¶7

 1. Shri Bhalchandra J. Patil & 8 ors. ] .. Respondents
 (Ori.Claimants)

¶8

 Mr. C.M. Lokesh i/b M/s. G.S. Hegde & Associates for
 the appellants.

¶9

 Mr. C.M. Korde, senior counsel with Mr. Milind Jadhav
 i/b Pravin Mehta & Mithi & Co. for the original
 claimants.

¶10

CORAM: R.M. LODHA, &
S.A. BOBDE, JJ.
DATED: 14TH DECEMBER, 2006

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

 . Mr. C.M. Lokesh, the Advocate for the

¶13

 appellants submits that Mr. G.S. Hegde, Advocate is to
 argue the matter and since he is held up in some other
 Court, he prays for adjournment.

¶14

 2. We find no justifiable reason to adjourn the

¶15

 matter. We asked Mr. C.M. Lokesh, Advocate, to
 proceed with the arguments. He did not do so. In the

¶16

 : 2 :

¶17

 circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the Appeal
 for want of prosecution.

¶18

 3. Appeal is dismissed accordingly.

¶19

 4. Upon dismissal of the Appeal, the claimants

¶20

 shall be entitled to withdraw the amount deposited by

¶21

 the appellants before this Court.

¶22

 Sd/-
[R.M. LODHA, J.]

¶23

 Sd/-
 [S.A. BOBDE, J.]

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Shri Bhalchandra Jagu Patil and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Shri Bhalchandra Jagu Patil and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms.Lyla Jehangir Vs B.Lentin and Ors.

M/S Permanet Hangets Ltd. Vs Shri Gajanan L.Borkar and Anr.

Union of India Vs Suresh Thanawala and 3 Ors.

The Hindustan Const. Co. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Anr.

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Vs Nagubai G Patil and Ors.

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Vs Jjaganath Anandrao Patil.