Criminal Application was adjourned at the morning session due to the absence of the applicant and his advocate. The matter was left pending and disposed of with liberty to apply later.
Criminal application disposed of without deciding merits with liberty to apply for bail at a later stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2358 OF 2006
Farook Hasan Mev Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra Respondent
M.N.Sandhyanshiv for applicant.
P.A.Pole, APP for State.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 22nd August 2006
PC :
1. None was present for the applicant in the
morning session when the matter was called out.
Even after the recess the applicant’s advocate
has not remained present to argue the matter.
2. The Sessions Court has recorded that the
matter is part heard and in view of the fact that
the Trial Court is going on, it is not necessary
to consider the present application. Criminal
Application is disposed of with liberty to apply
for bail at a later stage.
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Farook Hasan Mev
The State of Maharashtra
S.C. Dharwadhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court