In absence of counsel, the High Court held the criminal appeals infructuous as appellants were already released, conviction, sentence executed, and fines paid; accordingly, the appeals were dismissed.
The appeals were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.856 OF 2000
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.857 OF 2000
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders.
of Coram, appearance, Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
None for the appellant.
CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J.
DATED : 05/6/2006.
P.C.
1. The Advocate for the appellant is
absent. Office Note indicates that
both the appellants have already been
released from the jail after undergoing
conviction and sentence . The fine
amount is also paid. The appeal is
therefore, infractuous and hence, the
appeal is dismissed.
Cri. Appeal No.857/2000
1. The Advocate for the appellant is
absent. S.O. for two weeks.
PC
R.S. MOHITE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court