The High Court rejected the second application for anticipatory bail, directing the applicant to file the petition before the Aurangabad bench or a competent Sessions Court.
Application for anticipatory bail rejected; liberty to apply at Aurangabad bench or Sessions Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1472 OF 2006
-------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances, Court’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
-------------------------------------------------------
Mr.H.A.Solkar for the applicants.
Mr.K.V.Saste APP for the State.
Coram : R.S.Mohite,J
Date : 15.6.2006.
PC
1. This is a 2nd application
for grant of anticipatory bail.
Earlier application for
anticipatory bail was filed in
this Court as there was
apprehension that the complaint
would be filed at Nagpada police
station. This Court has
protected the present applicants
and directed that 72 hours
notice would be given before
arrest. Now the 2nd petition is
filed expressing apprehension
that the complaint may be filed
at Nanded and Parbhani police
stations and once again
: 2 :
application for anticipatory
bail was filed. The application
may be filed before the
Aurangabad bench. Application
is rejected with liberty to
apply before the Aurangabad
bench or competent Sessions
Court.
(R.S.Mohite,J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present application for grant of anticipatory bail should be allowed.
Applicants
State
R.S.Mohite
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court