This criminal application was dismissed by reference to the reasons provided in a companion application without any substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1099 OF 2004
Sameer Madhukar Chavan .. Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Rakesh Bhatkar for applicant
Mr.R.M.Gadkari, A.P.P. for State
Mr.Manoj Bhatt for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 23rd August 2006.
P.C.
. Learned Advocate appearing for applicant
invites my attention to the order passed on 25th
April 2006 in Criminal Application No.1098 of
2
2004. This is a companion matter and, therefore,
for the reasons set out in the order passed in
Criminal Application No.1098 of 2004, this
application shall also stand dismissed.
(S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)
Sameer Madhukar Chavan
State of Maharashtra
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court