In this Criminal Appeal No. 60 of 2006, the High Court of Bombay at Bombay disposed of a Criminal Application No. 73 of 2006 filed by the appellant-accused. The court allowed a 156-day delay in filing the appeal through jail, admitting the appeal.
Delay of 156 days in the appeal through jail was condoned; the appeal was admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2006
In
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.60 OF 2006
Ananta Vasant Waghmare : Appellant
(Orig.Accused No.1)
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra : Respondent
Mrs.Sarojini Upadhya for the appellant.
Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the
State.
CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE & S.A.BOBDE,JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 3, 2006.
P.C.
1. This is an appeal through jail. There is a delay of
156 days.
2. Heard the Advocate for the appellant-accused and the
learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The learned Addl.
Public Prosecutor has no objection for condoning the
delay. Delay condoned. The Criminal Application stands
disposed of.
3. The appeal is admitted.
D.G. DESHPANDE, J.
S.A. BOBDE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 156 days in the appeal through jail should be condoned.
Ananta Vasant Waghmare
The State of Maharashtra
D.G. Deshpande
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court