Disposed

Tanaji Kisan Patil and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC24 Apr 2006APPA/400/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge criminal appellate court disposed of Criminal Appeal No.366/2006. Noting variance between ocular and medical evidence regarding injuries, the court held no abuse of bail and ordered applicants released on trial court bail with fresh bonds.

What did the court decide?

Appeal admirited; applicants released on same bail as in trial court subject to furnishing fresh bonds pending hearing and final disposal of appeal.

Tanaji Kisan Patil and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2006)

¶1

 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE

¶2

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.366 OF 2006
 -------------------------------------------------------
 Office Notes, Office
 Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders
 appearances, Court’s orders
 or directions and
 Registrar’s orders
 -------------------------------------------------------
 Mr.K.S.Patil for the appellants.
 Mr.S.S.Tatkare APP for the State.
Coram : R.S.Mohite,J
 Date : 24.4.2006.
 PC
 1. Heard both sides.
 Admit.

¶3

(R.S.Mohite,J)

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION 400/2006

¶5

 1. Heard both sides. The appeal
 has been admitted on merits.
 There appears to be variation
 between the ocular evidence and
 the medical evidence in the sense
 that though all the witnesses
 talked about assault on the
 private part of the deceased, the
 Doctor has not deposed to any
 such injury similarly. Evidence
 of Doctor does not indicate any

¶6

 : 2 :

¶7

 injury on the back which can be

¶8

 caused by grinding stone. The

¶9

 applicants were on bail in the

¶10

 trial Court. There is no

¶11

 allegation of abusing of bail.
 Maximum sentence is of 5 years.

¶12

 In the circumstances, pending the
 hearing and final disposal of the

¶13

 appeal, applicants may be
 released on the same bail as in

¶14

 the trial Court subject to their

¶15

 furnishing fresh bonds.

¶16

(R.S.Mohite,J)

Tanaji Kisan Patil and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tanaji Kisan Patil and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Mohammed Vs Mohammed Hussin Abdul Khalik and Anr.

Devidas Keshav Divakar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vasant Ganpat Injal Vs Chimane Sanmitra Patsanstha Mydt., and Ors.

Mahendra Jaswant Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ananda Hari Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rajesh Madhusudan Gurav Vs the State of Maharashtra