This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
SUIT NO.5008 OF 1994
M. A Merchant
..Plaintiff.
Vs.
The Society for Higher Education of Women in India & Ors.
..Defendants.
Mr. Yashpal Jain for the Plaintiff. Mr. P. Purohit i/b Purohit & Purohit for Defendants 1 and 2. Mr. Amit Jaisinghani for Defendant No.4.
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
th October, 2006.
P.C. :
The Third Defendant has expired. Consent Terms
signed by the Plaintiff and by the Second and Fourth Defendants and by their respective advocates are taken on record and marked
as 'X'. Since the dispute between the parties has been settled, there shall be a decree in terms of the Consent Terms.
Refund, if any, as per rules.
Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
