This court disposed of a suit for administration of estate by passing a decree in terms of consent terms signed by parties during the pendency of proceedings.
Decree in terms of Consent Terms signed by Plaintiff and Defendants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
SUIT NO.2648 OF 1995
Smt. Suparna Tapan Das Vs.
Alok Ajit Pal & anr.
..Defendants.
Mr. Pankaj Kawali with Mr. U.M. Jhaveri for the Plaintiff. Mr. Basant Tilokani for Defendant Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
12th October, 2006.
P.C. :
The Plaintiff is the sister of the First Defendant. The dispute between the parties related to the administration of the estate of their deceased father. During the pendency of the suit, the dispute has been settled. Consent Terms signed by the Plaintiff and by the Second Defendant acting as the Constituted Attorney for the First Defendant and for himself and by the respective advocates have been tendered on the record and are taken on record and marked as 'X'. There shall be a decree in terms of the Consent Terms.
Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order issued by the office of this Court.
Alok Ajit Pal
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
