Petitioners withdrew the related writ petition (no. 915/1993) raising the same controversy. The High Court found the present writ petition no longer survived and dismissed it as infructuous, discharging the rule.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous and rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.80 OF 1993
M/s.Parke Ramedies Petitioners
vs. The Union of India & ors. None for the petitioners.
Respondents
Ms.S.V.Bharucha for the respondent no.1.
Mr.P.M.Mokashi, A.G.P. for the respondent no.2.
CORAM : R. M. LODHA &
J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ .
DATED : 11th August 2005
P.C.
| No | ne appear |
s for |
the | petition | ers. | In | the c |
onnected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| writ | petition | being | writ | petiti | on | no.915/1993 | the | |
| learned | counsel | for the |
pe | titioners | inf | ormed | us that |
the |
| controversy | raised | in | the | wr | it | petition | no | longer |
| survived | and, | accordi | ngly, | the | said | writ | petition | was |
| dismissed | as | infructuous. | This | writ | petition | too | is |
dismissed as infructuous. Rule is discharged. No
costs.
(R.M. LODHA,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s.Parke Ramedies
The Union of India
R. M. LODHA
J.P. DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
