Petitioners contended that they had received the Continuous Discharge Certificate (C.D.C.). The court held the writ petition infructuous and the petition disposed of as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.652 OF 1993
Hemantkumar Ganpat Tandel & 23 ors.
Petitioners
vs.
Union of India & 3 ors.
Respondents
Ms.Usha Singh i/b.M/s.Vyas & Bhalwal for the petitioners.
CORAM : R. M. LODHA &
J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ .
DATED : 11th August 2005
P.C.
Heard.
| 2. | Th | e | learned | couns | el | for the |
petitione | rs | does | not |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dispute | that | Cont | inuous | Discharge | Certif | icate | (C.D.C.) | |||
| has | been | rece | ived | by | the | petitioners. | In | the | writ |
|
| petition, | the | petitione | rs | have | prayed |
for | direc | tion | to | |
| the | respo | ndents | to | issue | C.D.C. | to | the | petitioners. |
The same having been issued, nothing remains in the writ
petition.
is discharged. No costs.
(R.M. LODHA,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Hemantkumar Ganpat Tandel & 23 ors.
Union of India & 3 ors.
R.M. LODHA
J.P. DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
