Dilip Machindra Dune v. Jayshri Dilip Dune and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/795/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
Issue for consideration
Whether the High Court was correct in enhancing maintenance without the father contributing to the petitioner's income.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶2
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.795 OF 2005
¶4
Dilip Machindra Dune ...Petitioner
¶5
Versus
¶6
Sou.Jayshri Dilip Dune & Ors. ...Respondents
¶7
Mr.A.M.Utagikar for Petitioner.
¶8
None for Respondents 1 and 2.
¶9
Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for Respondent No.3.
¶10
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
¶11
APRIL 12, 2005.
¶12
P.C.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the High Court was correct in enhancing maintenance without the father contributing to the petitioner's income.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Dilip Machindra Dune
- respondent
Sou.Jayshri Dilip Dune & Ors.
Coram
AI extract
A.M. Khanwilkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court