On an oral motion by the petitioners regarding technical defects, two criminal writ petitions were allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions and disposed of as withdrawn.
Petitions allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
(G.C.P.)J 455 (5,00,000)-11.2001) Spl-H.C.,A.S.,C.D.,78e
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.542 OF 2005
And
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.543 OF 2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
order or directions and
Registrar’s order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri N.Chomal for the petitioners.
Shri D.S.Mhaispurkar for the respondents.
--
CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
&
P.V.KAKADE, JJ
DATED: 7th March, 2005.
P.C.
. On oral motion by the learned
Advocate for the petitioners that since
there are some technical defects in the
petitions, the petitioners desire to
withdraw the petitions with liberty to file
a fresh. The petitions are accordingly
allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file
fresh petitions and the same stand disposed
of as withdrawn.
(R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J )
- 2 -
(P.V.KAKADE, J )
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
P.V.KAKADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court