Petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an educational order. Counsel produced a withdrawal letter. The court recorded the letter and discharged the petitioner, disposing of the petition without costs.
Petition discharged and disposed of; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3828 OF 2003
Gajanan Shikshan Sanstha & Anr. ..Petitioners
Vs.
The Education Officer(Secondary)
Zilla Parishad & Ors. ..Respondents
-----
Mr.Anil V. Anturkar for Petitioners
Mr.M.C.Patil for intervener
Mr.E.R. Sonawane for Respondent Nos.1 & 3
Mr.P.D.Dalvi for Respondent No.2
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO &
S.P. KUKDAY, JJ.
DATE: 26TH APRIL, 2005.
P.C.
. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner
produces a letter received by them from the
Petitioners giving instructions to withdraw the
Petition. Letter taken on record and marked as ‘X’
for identification.
. In the light of that Rule discharged.
Petition stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
(F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(S.P. KUKDAY,J.)
Gajanan Shikshan Sanstha & Anr.
The Education Officer(Secondary) Zilla Parishad & Ors.
F.I. REBELLO
S.P. KUKDAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court