A petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies' Act, 1960 was dismissed. The court noted that the issue was already concluded by the Nagpur Bench, which held the provision to be intra vires.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.2260 OF 2005
Sou. Priya Parasnath Tongay. Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Respondents.
Mr.Anurag Jain for the Petitioner. Mr. Y. D. Mulani, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : A.P. SHAH AND
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ.
August 9, 2005.
P.C.:
The only issue raised in this petition is about the constitutional validity of Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-
operative Societies' Act, 1960. This issue is already concluded by the decision of the Nagpur Bench, whereby the provision has been held to be intra vires. Petition is dismissed.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies' Act, 1960 is constitutionally valid.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sou. Priya Parasnath Tongay
State of Maharashtra
A.P. Shah
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
