The court disposed of a criminal writ petition where the applicant's counsel informed the court that the underlying civil dispute had been amicably settled and the petition was not pressed forward.
The petition is disposed of having not been pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2255 OF 2005
Sunil Ramesh Shitap.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Others.. Respondent
Mr. A.Y. Sakhare for the petitioner.
Mr. D.R. More, A.P.P., for the respondents.
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED: 4TH OCTOBER, 2005
P.C. :
1.Mr. Sakhare, the learned Counsel appearing
for the petitioners states that the Civil dispute
between the petitioner and respondent No.8 has been
amicably settled. He has instructions not to press this
petition. The petition is disposed of having not
pressed. Petitioner, Sunil Ramesh Shitap is present in
the Court.
[SMT. RANJANA P. DESAI, J.]
: 2 :
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
Sunil Ramesh Shitap
The State of Maharashtra and Others
Ranjana Desai
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court