Petitioners sought to withdraw this PIL with liberty to file a fresh petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file fresh petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 50 OF 2004
Yashwant Shankarrato Nimhan & Anr.... ... Petitioners.
Versus
.... Municipal Corporation of Pune & Ors. Respondents.
Mr. A. V. Anturkar with Mr. Sangram P. Pawar for the Petitioners. Mr. R. G. Ketkar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. R. S. Apte for Respondent No.3.
Mr. S. M. Gorwadkar for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C. J. &
S. A. BOBDE, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 21, 2005.
2
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. This petition is dismissed
as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
S. A. BOBDE, J.
Yashwant Shankarrato Nimhan & Anr.
Municipal Corporation of Pune & Ors.
Dalveer Bhandari
S. A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
