Petitioner withdrew Public Interest Litigation No. 2 of 2005. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and allowed liberty to take appropriate legal steps.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 2 OF 2005
Er. K.V. Prasadrao
...Petitioner
Versus
Union of India
...Respondent
Petitioner in person.
CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 2005 .
P.C.
The petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition. This petition
is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. He would be at liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with law.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.A. BOBDE, J.
Er. K.V. Prasadrao
Union of India
DALVEER BHANDARI
S.A. BOBDE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
