In default of the petitioner's appearance, this public interest litigation was disposed of without any adjudication on merits. The court dismissed the petition, leaving no substantive proposition of law to cite.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 106 OF 2005
Mr. S. S. Gadre......... ..... ... Petitioner. Versus Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors... .... ... Respondents.
None present for the Petitioner. Mr. R.G.Ketkar for Respondent Nso.1 and 2.
CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : OCTOBER 19, 2005.
P.C. :
None is present for the petitioner. This public interest
litigation is dismissed in default.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Mr. S. S. Gadre
Pune Municipal Corporation
Dalveer Bhandari
Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
