This PIL petition by students' federation was dismissed as it no longer survives following the Supreme Court's judgment in P.A. Inamdar concerning educational admissions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PIL NO. 107 OF 2004
Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad & Anr. …Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra ... Respondents.
Mrs. Anjali Helekar for the Petitioners
Mr. P.M. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for the Respondent.
CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J., & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: OCTOBER 19, 2005.
P.C.:-
In view of the judgment of the 7-Judge Bench of the
Apex Court in P.A. Inamdar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (AIR 2005 SC 3226), this PIL does not survive, and is accordingly dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether PIL No. 107 of 2004 survives after the judgment of the 7-Judge Bench in P.A. Inamdar.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P.A. Inamdar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (AIR 2005 SC 3226)Followed¶11
Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad & Anr.
State of Maharashtra
Dalveer Bhandari
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
