Dismissed
Greag Flynn and Anr. Vs
Bombay HCFAP/9/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners sought to withdraw the F.A. petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without any order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶3
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶4
F.A. PETITION NO. 9 OF 2005
¶5
In the matter of Guardians and Wards
¶6
Act, 1890
¶7
Greg Flynn & Anr. .. Petitioners.
¶8
Mrs. M.S. Diwan i/by M/s. Mahimtura & Co.
¶9
for petitioners.
¶10
Mrs. M. Kajle, AGP for Respondent State.
¶11
Nr. O. Hari with Ms. Pranjali Ahire
¶12
representative of ICSW present.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Greg Flynn
- petitioner
Mrs. M.S. Diwan
- respondent
Mrs. M. Kajle
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Naresh Rampadarath Choudhary and Ors. Vs Bhaguram Sudkaji Tambe and Ors. and Naresh Rampadarath Choudhary and Ors.
Global Infrastructure and Technologies Ltd. Vs G. K. Builders and Sanja S. Ranka
Global Infrastructure and Technologies Ltd. Vs G. K. Builders and Anjana P. Shrishrimal
M.J.Postma and Anr. Vs