Disposed

Global Infrastructure and Technologies Ltd. v. G. K. Builders and Sanja S. Ranka

Bombay HC15 Feb 2005CHS/241/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court disposed of multiple chamber summons filed in execution applications. The court made the summons absolute, ordered warrants of attachment to be raised, and directed the release of the property 'Ronak Apartments' from attachment based on the decree holder's statement.

What did the court decide?

Chamber summons made absolute; warrants of attachment raised; property 'Ronak Apartments' released from attachment; no order as to costs.

Global Infrastructure and Technologies Ltd. Vs G. K… — Execution and Attachment | Bombay HC (2005)

¶1

:1:

¶2

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 256 OF 2004
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.496 OF 2003
IN
AWARD DATED 17/7/2003

¶5

 Global Infrastructure and
 Technologies Ltd. .... Applicants/
 Claimants
 v/s.
 G.K. Builders ..... Respondents
 AND
 Anjana Prathviraj Shrishrimal ..... Applicant

¶6

CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 257 OF 2004
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.496 OF 2003
IN
AWARD DATED 17/7/2003

¶7

 Global Infrastructure and
 Technologies Ltd. .... Applicants/
 Claimants
 v/s.
 G.K. Builders ..... Respondents
 AND

¶8

 Simandhar Properties Pvt. Ltd ..... Applicant

¶9

CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 258 OF 2004
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.496 OF 2003
IN
AWARD DATED 17/7/2003

¶10

 Global Infrastructure and
 Technologies Ltd. .... Applicants/
 Claimants
 v/s.
 G.K. Builders ..... Respondents

¶11

:2:

¶12

 AND
 Sushila Suresh Seth ..... Applicant
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 241 OF 2004
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.496 OF 2003
IN
AWARD DATED 17/7/2003

¶13

 Global Infrastructure and
 Technologies Ltd. .... Applicants/
 Claimants
 v/s.
 G.K. Builders ..... Respondents
 AND
 Sanjay Sukhraji Ranka ..... Applicant

¶14

 Sanjay Jain with R.B. Jain i/b. Lega Junis for the
 Applicants.
 A.Y. Bookwala i/b. S. Mirzankar for the respodents.
 None for the plaintiffs.

¶15

 CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J.

¶16

DATE : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2005.

¶17

P.C. :

¶18

 1. The learned counsel for the decree holder

¶19

 states that he has no objection if the said chamber
 summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause
 (a). Warrant of attachment in respect of the said
 property are raised. All Chamber Summons are
 disposed off accordingly. There shall be no orders
 as to costs.

¶20

:3:

¶21

 2. The learned counsel for the decree holder
 states that even in respect of the property being
 ‘Ronak Apartments’ situated at Junction no.1. and 4
 of Rajawadi Road, Ghatkopar (East), Mumbai-400 077
 the attachment be raised. In view of the statement

¶22

 of the decree holder the said property stands

¶23

 released from attachment.

¶24

 SD/-

¶25

 ********

Global Infrastructure and Technologies Ltd. v. G. K. Builders and Sanja S. Ranka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Global Infrastructure and Technologies Ltd. v. G. K. Builders and Sanja S. Ranka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Canara Bank Vs Shree Gautam Textiles and Ors.

Mr. Shekhar Shetty and Anr. Vs Rani Nasta and Ors.

Girish C.Lodha Alias Girish N.Mehta Vs Niyamat Zahirali Gassam and Anr.

Naresh Rampadarath Choudhary and Ors. Vs Bhaguram Sudkaji Tambe and Ors. and Naresh Rampadarath Choudhary and Ors.

Global Infrastructure and Technologies Ltd. Vs G. K. Builders and Anjana P. Shrishrimal

Global Infrastructure Technologies Ltd. Vs G. K. Builders and Simandhar Properties Pvt. Ltd.