The court disposed of a chamber summons seeking to add a proposed defendant (Mr. Mehta) to another suit. The proposed defendant stated no objection, and all rights were kept open.
Chamber summons disposed of; proposed defendant added with rights kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 150 OF 2005 IN
SUIT NO. 168 OF 2005
Girish Lodha.
... Plaintiff.
V/s.
Niyamat Zahirali Cassam and another.
... Respondents.
H.S.S.Murthy i/b. V.N.Tayade for the plaintiff.
R.D.Soni for defendant No.1.
Mr.B.Davnekar for defendant No.2.
Mr.H.C.Mehta for defendant No.3.
CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J.
DATED : 14th February, 2005.
P.C. :
. By the present chamber summons the plaintiff seeks to amend the plaint by adding proposed defendant No.3 as party defendant No.3. Mr.Mehta appearing for the proposed defendant states that he
has no objection if his rights are kept open for
determining the suit.
. Addition of defendant No.3 shall not prejudice rights of proposed defendant No.3 on merits. All rights and contentions on merits are kept open. Chamber summons is disposed of in terms
of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
1 issue framed by the court
Whether plaintiff can be added as defendant No.3 in the suit.
Girish Lodha
Niyamat Zahirali Cassam
S.U. KAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
