The court dismissed an application for cancellation of bail as it was filed time-barred due to delay without any grievance regarding violation of bail conditions.
Application dismissed as there was no grievance regarding violation of bail conditions after a long delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2954 OF 2003
Dhondiba Genu Randive. ... Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents.
Mr. P.S.Dani, advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.
19th April, 2005
P.C.:
1. As this application is for cancellation
of bail, takes exception to the bail order passed
in favour of the private respondent as back as on
30th April, 2003, at this distance of time, I see
no reason to interfere with that order as no
grievance is made that the private
respondent-accused has violated any of the
conditions of the bail. Hence dismissed.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application ought to be allowed after a long delay without a specific grievance regarding bail conditions?
Dhondiba Genu Randive
The State of Maharashtra
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court