Application for cancellation of bail filed after a significant lapse of time. The court dismissed the application noting no grievances regarding violation of bail conditions.
Application for cancellation of bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2954 OF 2003
Dhondiba Genu Randive. ... Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents.
Mr. P.S.Dani, advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.
19th April, 2005
P.C.:
1. As this application is for cancellation
of bail, takes exception to the bail order passed
in favour of the private respondent as back as on
30th April, 2003, at this distance of time, I see
no reason to interfere with that order as no
grievance is made that the private
respondent-accused has violated any of the
conditions of the bail. Hence dismissed.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to cancel the bail order obtained by the accused on 30th April, 2003, in a criminal appeal filed in 2005.
Dhondiba Genu Randive
The State of Maharashtra
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court