The High Court dismissed the suit under Order 9 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure because neither plaintiff nor defendant appeared when called on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.2030 of 1985
Mrs Meera MohanPlff
vs
Anil Gandottra & ors.Defts
..
None present
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J
DATED : 12th August, 2005.
P.C.
1. None present for either side when called. The
suit is dismissed under order 9 Rule 3 of the Code
of Civil Procedure.
D.G.KARNIK, J
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court