Disposed
Suresh a.Salian v. Laxmi N.Agarwal
Bombay HCS/1490/1985
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court observed that the sole defendant expired more than six years prior, and since his heirs were not impleaded, the suit stood abated. No legal advice offered.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
SUIT NO.1490 of 1985
¶4
Suresh Anand Salian
¶5
.. Plaintiff
¶6
versus
¶7
Laxmi Narayan Aggarwal
¶8
.. Defendant
¶9
Mr.R.C.Dubey i/b S.Kanchan & Co for Plff
¶10
Ms Meena Madhusudan i/b E.Lam & Co for Deft
¶11
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J
¶12
DATED : 11th August, 2005.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the suit abates when the sole defendant dies and his heirs are not brought on record.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Suresh Anand Salian
- respondent
Laxmi Narayan Aggarwal
Coram
AI extract
D.G. Karnik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court