A single paragraph order under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC decreing a suit for recovery of money for the plaintiff, as the defendant had failed to file a written statement.
Suit decreed for recovery of money as per prayer clause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.1981 of 1985
Universal Cables Ltd.. Plaintiff
versus
Reliable Roadways..Defendant
Mr.D.B.Parab i/b Gor.Foz.for Plaintiff
None for Defendant
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J
DATED : 12th August, 2005.
P.C.
1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff. None
present for the defendants. The defendants has not
filed the written statement for nearly 20 years.
Hence, the averments made in the plaint are deemed
to be admitted.
2. The suit is for recovery of money. The suit of
the plaintiff is decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of
the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of the prayer
clause.
2
D.G.KARNIK, J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to decree for recovery of money in the absence of defendant's written statement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Universal Cables Ltd.
Reliable Roadways.
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court