The court dismissed a writ petition challenging the Tribunal's finding that a government employee was not entitled to adjustment of his long absence against Earned Leave or Half Pay after his transfer was cancelled and he remained at Pune.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7243 OF 2004
Pandurang Banderao Pujari Petitioner
versus
State of Maharashtra & others Respondents
Shiv Motriya, adv. for petitioner.
V.P.Malvankar, AGP for respondents.
CORAM : A.P.SHAH AND
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ.
DATE : 1st November 2004
PC :
Heard advocate for petitioner. Perused order
of Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
2. Petitioner, with a view to avoid joining at
transferred place, remained absent for a long
period and joined the service only after his
transfer was cancelled and he was retained at
Pune. Tribunal has, therefore, rightly held that
the petitioner is not entitled for adjustment of
this period against Earned Leave or Half Pay
Leave. Petition is dismissed.
(A.P.SHAH, J.)
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to adjustment of his period of absence against Earned Leave or Half Pay Leave after his transfer was cancelled and he was retained at Pune?
Pandurang Banderao Pujari
State of Maharashtra
A.P. Shah
S.C. Dharmadikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court