Mandar Pharma v. Dr. L.B.Srivastava
Bombay HCSS/572/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYIN THE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶2
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 572 OF 2003
¶3
M/s. Mandar Pharma ..Plaintiff
¶4
versus
¶5
Dr. L. B. Srivastava ..Defendant
¶6
Mr. P. S. Shah for the Plaintiff.
¶7
None for the Defendant.
¶8
CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J.
¶9
DATE : 11TH OCTOBER 2004.
P.C. :
¶10
. The matter is on board for exparte hearing.
Counsel for the Plaintiffs present. Nobody is
present for the Defendant. Counsel for the
plaintiff files affidavit of service and compilation
of original documents. The same is taken on record.
¶11
The defendant is served through RPAD,
acknowledgement is filed with the affidavit of
service. This is sufficient service. Nobody is
present for the defendant. Under these
circumstances, the suit stands decreed as prayed for
with 12% future interest from the date of the suit
till realisation and costs. Refund of court fees,
as per the Rules. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
Certified copy expedited.
Coram
AI extract
D. G. DESHPANDE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court