Court recorded Minutes of Consent Decree filed by plaintiffs and defendants. Decree passed as per the Minutes. Suit and summons disposed.
Decree passed as per the Minutes of Consent Decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 320 OF 2003
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2399 OF 2002
Wud Lam Enterprise ..Plaintiffs
versus
Grade Products & Anr. ..Defendants
Mr. V. S. Master for the Plaintiffs.
Defendant No.2 present in person.
CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J.
DATE : 6TH OCTOBER 2004.
P.C. :
. Heard learned counsel for the Plaintiffs.
Defendant No.2 who is sole proprietor of the
defendant No.1 is also present. They file Minutes
of Consent Decree duly signed by the plaintiffs and
their Advocate and Defendant No.2 who is present for
himself as well as for the defendant No.1. Minutes
of Consent Decree taken on record and marked ’X’ for
identification. There shall be a decree as per the
Minutes of Consent Decree. Refund of court fees as
per the Rules. Suit and Summons for Judgment stands
disposed of accordingly. Certified copy expedited.
2
****
D. G. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court