This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO. 99 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8929 OF 2003.
Mukund P. Rasal & Ors. ...... V/s
........ Petitioners.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.... .......Respondents. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.M.D.Lonkar, Adv. for the petitioners.
Mr.R.M.Patne, AGP for the State. Mr.R.V.More, respondent Nos.2 & 3.
CORAM:V.G.PALSHIKAR AND V.M. KANADE, JJ.
20.9.2004 (Chamber)
PC:
No case for review made out. Hence
Review Petition stands rejected.
20.9.2004
1
Mukund P. Rasal & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
V.G. Palshikar
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
