This review petition filed in the High Court at Bombay sought a review of a Writ Petition order dated 16th July 2004, which was dismissed, and the reviewing court found no apparent error on the face of the record, leading to its dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE.
REVIEW PETITION NO. 98 OF 200 4
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4459 OF 200 4
Pradeep B. Thakur ....... Petitioner.
versus
State of Maharashtra & ors...... Respondents.
Shri Uday Warunjikar for the petitioner. Shri C.R. Sonawane for State.
CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.M. KANADE, JJ.
DATED; 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2004.
P.C.;
| 1. | By | this | petition, | the | petit | ioner | seeks review |
of | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| the | order | dated | 16th | July | 2004. | In | our opinion |
there | |
| is | no e |
rror | appar | ent on |
the | face | of | record in |
the |
order. Hence no review is maintainable. Hence Review
Petition is dismissed.
Pradeep B. Thakur
State of Maharashtra
V.G. Palshikar
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
