The High Court of Bombay disposed of the review application as no case for review was made out, permitting the petitioner to make a fresh representation.
Application disposed; liberty to make fresh representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2260 OF 2004
IN REVIEW APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 21313 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1275 OF 2003.
Sudhakar U. Ubale......... .... Petitioner.
V/s Chief Executive Officer Z.P. Solapur & Ors...... .... Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.M.A.Choudhari, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.Nitin Jamdar Adv. for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Mrs.J.S.Pawar, AGP for respondent No.5.
CORAM:V.G.PALSHIKAR
AND V.M. KANADE, JJ.
20.9.2004 (Chamber)
PC:
No case for review made out.
Therefore reviw application stands disposed of. However the petitioner shall be at liberty to make fresh representation which if made be
expeditiously decided.
1
20.9.2004.
2
Sudhakar U. Ubale
Chief Executive Officer Z.P. Solapur
V.G. PALSHIKAR
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
