FPA-PMLA-2895/BNG/2019 of Smt. G. v. Radha v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Case brief
What is this about?
Smt. G. V. Radha V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-5620/BNG/2019 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2894/BNG/2019 Shri G. E. Veerabhadrappa … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent & 2. MP-PMLA-5621/BNG/2019 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2895/BNG/2019 Smt. G. V. Radha … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent (ED) : None CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER
12.02.2021
FPA-PMLA-2894/BNG/2019 & FPA-PMLA-2895/BNG/2019
The matters are listed on 19th February, 2021 but due to pandemic
| COVID-19 si | tuation and in | view of notice | dated 12.02.20 | 21 read with |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| earlier noti |
fications dated |
16.03.2020, |
23.03.2020, |
26.03.2020, |
| 15.04.2020, | 04.05.2020, | 18.05.2020, | 30.06.2020, | 16.07.2020, |
| 31.07.2020, | 17.08.2020, | 02.09.2020, | 08.09.2020, | 14.09.2020, |
| 30.09.2020, | 15.10.2020, | 29.10.2020, | 13.11.2020, | 27.11.2020, |
| 31.12.2020, | 15.01.2021 & | 29.01.2021 is | sued by Appel | late Tribunal |
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri G. E. Veerabhadrappa
- appellant
Smt. G. V. Radha
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · February
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-2895/BNG/2019
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court