The Appellate Tribunal adjourned two Prevention of Money Laundering Act appeals to 01st July, 2021, due to the pandemic and suspension of functioning, clarifying that any interim orders remain in force.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-PMLA-1657/HYD/2017 K. Lalitha … Appellants Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad & Ors. … Respondents & 2. FPA-PMLA-1818/HYD/2017 Bijay Kumar Mandhani … Appellants Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad & Ors. … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent (ED) : None CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 26.02.2021
FPA-PMLA-1657/HYD/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1818/HYD/2017
The matters are listed on 01st March, 2021 but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notice dated 26.02.2021 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020, 02.09.2020, 08.09.2020, 14.09.2020, 30.09.2020, 15.10.2020, 29.10.2020, 13.11.2020, 27.11.2020, 31.12.2020, 15.01.2021, 29.01.2021 & 19.02.2021 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 01st July, 2021.
FPA-PMLA-1657/HYD/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1818/HYD/2017
Page 1 of 2
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any,
already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-In-Charge
New Delhi, 26th February, 2021
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1657/HYD/2017
& FPA-PMLA-1818/HYD/2017
Page 2 of 2
K. Lalitha
Bijay Kumar Mandhani
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
