FPA-PMLA-1818/HYD/2017 of Bijay Kumar Madhani v/s The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Case brief
What is this about?
Bijay Kumar Madhani V/s The Joint Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-1727/HYD/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1728/HYD/2015 (Exemption FPA-PMLA-914/HYD/2015 |
) | |
|---|---|---|
| Indukuri Prasad Reddy | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-2436/HYD/2016 (Mics.) FPA-PMLA-931/HYD/2015 |
||
| Koneru Pradeep | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (3) FPA-PMLA-932/HYD/2015 | ||
| Koneru Rajendra Pradeep | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (4) FPA-PMLA-929/HYD/2015 | ||
| K.L. Narayana | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (5) FPA-PMLA-930/HYD/2015 | ||
| Stylish Holms Real Estates Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (6) MP-PMLA-1739/HYD/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-925/HYD/2015 |
||
| M/s. Southend Projects & Ltd. Versus |
… | Appellant/Applicant |
FPA-PMLA-914, 931, 932, 929, 930.925 & 912/HYD/2015 FPA-PMLA-2112, 1657 & 1818/HYD/2017, FPA-PMLA-467, 468, 455 & 536/DLI/2013
Page 1 of 3
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Indukuri Prasad Reddy
- appellant
Koneru Pradeep
- appellant
Koneru Rajendra Pradeep
- appellant
K.L. Narayana
- appellant
Stylish Holms Real Estates Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court