Disposed

FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 of M/s. Uco Bank v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

ATFP18 Jan 2021FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeals in 5 cases against FEMA/PMLA orders by banking companies. The tribunal stayed arguments for one bank allowing further argument by the Enforcement Director; the remaining matters were listed for the next day.

What did the court decide?

Request for adjournment of the Respondent allowed; appeals for specific banks listed on 19.01.2021.

FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 of M/s. Uco Bank v/s The Special Director… — Banking and Recovery | ATFP (2021)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT Act AT NEW DELHI

¶2

(1) FPA-FE-58/MUM/2009 M/s. South Indian Bank	…	Appellant
Versus
The Special Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
(2) FPA-FE-59/MUM/2009
M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad	…	Appellant
Versus
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
(3) FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009
M/s. Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur	…	Appellant
Versus
The Special Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
(4) FPA-FE-65/MUM/2009
M/s. Dena Bank	…	Appellant
Versus
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
&
(5) FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009
M/s. UCO Bank	…	Appellant
Versus
The Special Director
Directorate of Enforcement Mumbai		Respondent
,	…
Advocates/Authorized Representatives wh	o appe	ared
For the Appellant (South Indian Bank) :	Shri Shri	Madhav Khurana, Advocate Aditya Mukherjee, Advocate
	Ms. Ms.	Satya Jha, Advocate Riya Arora, Advocate

¶3

FPA-FE-58-59/MUM/2009, FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-65-66/MUM/2009

¶4

Page 1 of 2

¶5

For the Appellant (M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad)	:	Shri Ashok Kr. Panda, Sr. Advocate Shri A.V. Rangam, Advocate Shri Buddy A. Ranganadhan, Advocate
For the Appellant (M/s. Dena Bank)	:	Shri Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate Shri Arpan Wadhawan, Advocate
For the Appellant (M/s. UCO Bank)	:	Shri Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate Shri Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate
For the Respondent	:	Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate

¶6

CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN

¶7

ORDER 18.01.2021

¶8

The matter is taken up through video conferencing. The appearances of the learned counsels are as above.

¶9

FPA-FE-58-59/MUM/2009, FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-6566/MUM/2009

¶10

Further argument on behalf of the appellant i.e. South Indian Bank continued and concluded. The learned counsel for the Respondent (ED) argued the matter for some time and sought an adjournment. The request for adjournment is considered and allowed.

¶11

With the consent of both the parties, list the appeal tomorrow i.e. on 19.01.2021 for further argument on behalf of Respondent.

¶12

(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman

¶13

New Delhi, 18^th January, 2021

¶14

‘D’

¶15

FPA-FE-58-59/MUM/2009, FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-65-66/MUM/2009

¶16

Page 2 of 2

FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 of M/s. Uco Bank v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 of M/s. Uco Bank v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases