The Appellate Tribunal, sitting at New Delhi, ordered the adjournment of four foreign exchange management matters to 08.03.2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and prior suspension notifications. No substantive decision was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-FE-59/MUM/2009 M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad … Appellant 2. FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 M/s. State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur … Appellant 3. FPA-FE-65/MUM/2009 M/s. Dena Bank … Appellant 4. FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 M/s. UCO Bank … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : None For the respondent : None CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 31.12.2020
FPA-FE-59/MUM/2009, FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-65-66/MUM/2009
The matters are listed on 11th January, 2021 but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notification dated 31.12.2020 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020, 02.09.2020, 08.09.2020, 30.09.2020, 15.10.2020, 29.10.2020, 13.11.2020 & 27.11.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 8th March, 2021.
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any, already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-in- Charge
New Delhi, 31st December, 2020
‘m’
FPA-FE-59/MUM/2009, FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-65-66/MUM/2009
Page 1 of 1
M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad
M/s. Dena Bank
M/s. UCO Bank
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
