Disposed

FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 of M/s. Uco Bank v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

ATFP11 Jan 2021FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order records an adjournment in five appeals filed by banks against the Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement. Due to unavailability of senior counsel for Dena Bank and partial arguments by South Indian Bank's counsel, the hearing was adjourned for further arguments before a single judge.

What the court decided

AI extract

FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 of M/s. Uco Bank v/s The Special Director… — Company and Corporate | ATFP (2021)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1. FPA-FE-58/MUM/2009 M/s. South Indian Bank	…	Appellant
Versus
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
2. FPA-FE-59/MUM/2009 M/s. State Bank of Hyderabad	…	Appellant
Versus
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
3. FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 M/s. Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur	…	Appellant
Versus
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
4. FPA-FE-65/MUM/2009 M/s. Dena Bank	…	Appellant
Versus
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
&
5. FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 M/s. UCO Bank	…	Appellant
Versus
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives wh	o app	eared
For the Appellant No. 1 : Mr. : Mr. Ms.	Mad Adit Riya	hav Khurana, Advocate ya Mukherjee, Mr. Satya Jha, Arora, Advocates.
For the Appellant No. 2 : Mr. Mr. Mr.	A. K Bud Bha	. Panda, Sr. Advocate dy A. Ranganadhan, AN Adv. raadsule on behalf of SBI
For the Appellant No. 3 : Mr.	A.V.	Rangam, Adv.Mr.
For the Appellant No. 4 : Non	e
For the Appellant No. 5 : Non	e

¶3

FPA-FE-58-59/MUM/2009, FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-65-66/MUM/2009

¶4

Page 1 of 2

¶5

For the Respondent : Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN

¶6

ORDER 11.01.2021

¶7

FPA-FE-58, 59, 62, 65 & 66/MUM/2009

¶8

The matters are taken up through physical hearing on the request of ld. counsel for the respondent.

¶9

Mr. Madhav Khurana, ld. counsel for the M/s. South Indian Bank has argued the matter partly.

¶10

An adjournment letter has been received from Mr. Arpan Wadhawan, seeking time on the ground that the arguing senior counsel for M/s Dena Bank is unable to attend the physical hearing of the appeal due to reasons stated therein. The same is considered and allowed.

¶11

With the consent of both the parties, list the appeal at sr. no. 1 i.e. M/s. South Indian Bank on 18^th January, 2021 for further arguments. List the other appeals at sr. nos. 2 to 5 also on the same date.

¶12

(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman

¶13

New Delhi, 11^th January, 2021 S

¶14

FPA-FE-58-59/MUM/2009, FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-65-66/MUM/2009

¶15

Page 2 of 2

FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 of M/s. Uco Bank v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

FPA-FE-66/MUM/2009 of M/s. Uco Bank v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases