Disposed

FPA-PMLA-2453/PTN/2018 of Gudiya Devi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

ATFP7 Feb 2020FPA-PMLA-2453/PTN/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Listing order granting the respondent further time to file replies. If no reply is filed, the right to replies is deemed closed. Parties allowed to file written synopsis.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks extension for respondent to file replies; if null, right to reply deemed closed. Appellants granted four weeks for rejoinders.

FPA-PMLA-2453/PTN/2018 of Gudiya Devi v/s The Deputy Director… — Banking and Recovery | ATFP (2020)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1. MP-PMLA-4721/PTN/2018 (U.H.)
MP-PMLA-4722/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018
Gajendra Narayan	… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna	… Respondent
2. MP-PMLA-4747/PTN/2018 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-4748/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2452/PTN/2018
Danik Lal Mandal @ Bhutali & Anr.	… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna	… Respondent
3. MP-PMLA-4758/PTN/2018 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-4759/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2453/PTN/2018
Gudiya Devi	… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna	… Respondent
&
4. MP-PMLA-4764/PTN/2018 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-4765/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2456/PTN/2018
Smt. Rajanti Devi @ Rajanti Kumari	… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna	… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives wh	o appeared
For the Appellants : Mr.	S.K. Pandey, Adv.
Mr.	Awanish Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent : Mr.	Neeraj Atri, Advocate

¶3

FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018, FPA-PMLA-2452-2453/PTN/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2456/PTN/2018

¶4

Page 1 of 2

¶5

CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN

¶6

ORDER 07.02.2020

¶7

FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018, FPA-PMLA-2452-2453/PTN/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2456/PTN/2018

¶8

Ld. counsels for both the parties are present. Reply is not on record. Number of opportunities have already been given to the respondent to file the replies, even on the last date six weeks time was granted to the respondent but no replies forthcoming.

¶9

At the request of the ld. counsel for the respondent two weeks further time is granted to the respondent to file the replies with an advance copy to the other side as last opportunity. If no reply is filed by the respondent within time given above, the right to the replies would be deemed to be closed. In the event, reply has been filed by the respondent, appellant is granted four weeks time to file the rejoinders from the date of receipt of copy of the reply with an advance copy to the other side.

¶10

Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date.

¶11

List on 18^th August, 2020.

¶12

(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman

¶13

New Delhi, 7^th February, 2020

¶14

‘s’

¶15

FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018, FPA-PMLA-2452-2453/PTN/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2456/PTN/2018

¶16

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-2453/PTN/2018 of Gudiya Devi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-2453/PTN/2018 of Gudiya Devi v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases