FPA-PMLA-2453/PTN/2018 of Gudiya Devi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
Case brief
What is this about?
Hearing list order from the Appellate Tribunal, PMLA, New Delhi. Counsel for appellants was absent. Hearing adjourned to 14 Aug 2018. No substantive adjudication.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| **1. ** | MP-PMLA-4721/PTN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4722/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Gajendra Naryan … |
Appellant/Applicant | |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … |
Respondent | |
| **2. ** | MP-PMLA-4747/PTN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4748/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2452/PTN/2018 |
|
| Dhanik Lal Mandal @ Bhutali & Anot | … Appellant/Applicant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … |
Respondent | |
| **3. ** | MP-PMLA-4758/PTN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4759/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2453/PTN/2018 |
|
| Gudiya Devi | … Appellant/Applicant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … |
Respondent | |
| **4. ** | MP-PMLA-4764/PTN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-4765/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2456/PTN/2018 |
|
| Smt. Rajanti Devi @ Rajanti Kumar | … Appellant/Applicant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … |
Respondent | |
| Advo | cates/Authorized Representatives wh | o appeared |
| For t | he appellant : Mr. |
Pawan Kr. Mittal, Advocate |
| For t | he respondent : Mr. |
Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| COR | AM | |
| JUST | ICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CH |
AIRMAN |
| SHRI | G.C. MISHRA : ME |
MBER |
| FPA-PM | LA-2439, 2452, 2453 & 2456/PTN/2018 | Page 1 of 2 |
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gajendra Naryan
- appellant
Dhanik Lal Mandal
- appellant
Gudiya Devi
- appellant
Smt. Rajanti Devi
- respondent
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · August
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-2453/PTN/2018
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court