Adjournment of FPA-PMLA-1188/AHD/2016 granted due to unavailability of main counsel. Parties permitted to file written synopsis by the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1188/AHD/2016 Jayesh P. Khandwala HUF
… Appellant / Applicant
Versus
The Additional Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Ms. Surbhi Bhuraria, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. S. K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN ORDER 15.01.2020
FPA-PMLA-1188/AHD/2016
Ms. Surbhi Bhuraria, Proxy counsel appearing for Ms. Amrita Panda, Main counsel to the appellant is seeking an adjournment on the ground that the main counsel is not available today. Pleadings are complete in the matter. Written synopsis are not on record. Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis, as per the order dated 25.07.2019, by the next date.
List on 13th July, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 15th January, 2020.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1188/AHD/2016
Page 1 of 1
Jayesh P. Khandwala HUF
The Additional Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
