The tribunal granted the appellant one final opportunity to file a rejoinder deeming the current filing insufficient, listing the matter for 22nd September, 2017. No substantive legal decision or outcome is recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1188/AHD/2016
Jayesh P. Khandwala HUF … Appellant / Applicant
Versus The Additional Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Ms. Amrita Panda, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : None |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
08.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-1188/AHD/2016
Rejoinder has not been filed by the appellant. One final
opportunity is granted to the appellant to file the rejoinder.
List the matter on 22nd September, 2017
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 8th May, 2017
M
FPA-PMLA-1188/AHD/2014
Page 1 of 1
Jayesh P. Khandwala HUF
The Additional Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
