The Appellate Tribunal granted an adjournment in the appeal filed by Jayesh P. Khandwala HUF against the Additional Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad, as the respondent's counsel could not review the file.
Adjournment granted to the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1188/AHD/2016
Jayesh P. Khandwala HUF … Appellant
Versus
The Additional Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Mr. Ravichandra Hegde, Advocate Ms. Amrita Panda, Advocate Ms. Kirti Sasnur, Advocate Mr. Anshuman Ray, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 13.03.2018
FPA-PMLA-1188/AHD/2016
An adjournment is sought on behalf of the respondent as the Counsel was not able to go through the file which was given to him by Mr. Saud. The adjournment is not opposed by the learned Counsel for the appellant.
Re-notify on 3rd July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 13th March, 2018
‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1188/AHD/2014
Page 1 of 1
Jayesh P. Khandwala HUF
The Additional Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
