The Appellate Tribunal for CFI allowed the appeal under the PMLA, setting aside an order attaching property purchased in 1998 where no prosecution complaint was filed against the appellant.
The appeal was allowed by setting aside the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4877/DLI/2018 (U.A.) MP-PMLA-4878/DLI/2018 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2018
Shri Sanjay Kumar … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri R.K. Handoo, Advocate Shri Aditya Chaudhary, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 12.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2018
We have heard the learned counsel for both the parties and have also perused the written synopsis. Admittedly, the prosecution complaint has not been filed against the appellant. The property attached was purchased in the year 1998. The appeal is allowed by setting aside the impugned order. Reasons to follow.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra)
Member
New Delhi, 12th April, 2019
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2018
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal against the attachment of property should be allowed.
Shri Sanjay Kumar
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
