Disposed

FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2018 of Shri Sanjay Kumar v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP6 Sept 2018FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal issued procedural orders directing the filing of replies and rejoinders in a fresh appeal against an Adjudicating Authority's order. The tribunal also directed maintenance of status quo pending the hearing, with the appellant undertaking not to create third-party interests.

What did the court decide?

Replies and rejoinders to be filed within six and four weeks respectively; status quo maintained; appellant undertook not to dispose of properties.

FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2018 of Shri Sanjay Kumar v/s The Deputy… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2018)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-4877/DLI/2018 (U.A) MP-PMLA-4878/DLI/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2018

¶3

Shri Sanjay Kumar … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent

¶4

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶5

For the appellant	: Shri R.K. Handoo, Advocate Shri Aditya Chaudhary, Advocate
For the respondent	: Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER

¶6

ORDER 06.09.2018

¶7

FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2018

¶8

Fresh appeal has been filed under section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 24^th July, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority. Issue notice. Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, learned counsel for the respondent accepts the notice. Reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.

¶9

List the appeal on 19^th February, 2018.

¶10

MP-PMLA-4877/DLI/2018 (U.A) & MP-PMLA-4878/DLI/2018 (Stay)

¶11

Issue notice. Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, learned counsel for the respondent accepts the notice. Reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2015 Page 1 of 2

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

rejoinder four weeks thereafter. For the reasons stated in the application and as well as in terms of appeal both parties shall maintain status quo. On behalf of the appellant it is undertaken not to sell or create any third party right or interest in any manner directly or indirectly.

¶14

Copy of the order be given ‘dasti’ to both sides.

¶15

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶16

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶17

New Delhi,

¶18

6^th September, 2018

¶19

‘d’

¶20

FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2015

¶21

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2018 of Shri Sanjay Kumar v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-2510/DLI/2018 of Shri Sanjay Kumar v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases